WebSee 38 U.S.C. § 1110; Romanowsky v. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 289, 293 (2013); McLendon, 20 Vet.App. at 81. 3 (if ultimately deemed credible), and his current disability indicate that his … http://search.uscourts.cavc.gov/isysquery/1ede2541-0f58-427d-beb1-15f4b6a60a9b/60/doc/
Designated for electronic publication only
WebWise v. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 517, 530 (2014) (Court remands but goes on to address additional arguments “to ensure a proper decision by the Board on remand”); Romanowsky v. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 289, 295 (2013) (Court remands, then goes on to address the appellant’s argument that the Board erred in relying on a particular medical WebC:\USCAVC_Docs\SINGLE.CVA\BowersoxJR_21-7270.pdf BowersoxJR_21-7270.pdf buddha lounge bottomless brunch
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS …
http://www.uscourts.cavc.gov/documents/Romanowsky_11-3272.pdf WebJul 10, 2013 · Where the Board has incorrectly applied the law, failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its determinations, or where the record is otherwise inadequate, a remand is the appropriate remedy.”); cf. Deloach v.Shinseki, 704 F.3d 1370, 1380 (Fed.Cir.2013) (“[W]here the Board has performed the necessary fact-finding and … WebOct 11, 2005 · Sinensky v Rokowsky. 2005 NY Slip Op 07518. Decided on October 11, 2005. Appellate Division, Second Department. Published by New York State Law Reporting … crestwood subdivision covington la rentals